1971 Coupe vs Citroen test reprinted in drive-my.com

restart

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,194
Reaction score
173
Location
KANADA, Roberts Creek, BC
IMG_5427.JPG
https://drive-my.com/en/test-drive/item/1624-gian-test-citroen-sm-2-7-vs-bmw-3-0-cs.html
Interesting old school writing?
 

Philippe db

Well-Known Member
Messages
726
Reaction score
205
Location
Belgium
Nice read and interesting to see the cars they are compared to. A Dino 246, Iso Rivolta, and 911S cost the same. An E-Type was half the price. Amazing.
 

zinz

Well-Known Member
Site Donor $$
Messages
1,213
Reaction score
1,216
Location
Austin, Texas
"Neither car can approach the sort of drag strip acceleration of the Anglo-American bastards"

So funny.... I have a 1966 Car and Driver with articles on the 2000CS and a Plymouth Satellite with... a 426 Hemi.

Anglo-American Bastards indeed...

Car_and_Driver_Magazine-1966-April.jpg


Good times,

Ed
 

Ohmess

I wanna DRIVE!
Site Donor $
Messages
4,871
Reaction score
2,688
Location
Aiken, SC
I have never driven a car with a hydropneumatic suspension, and I have heard that both the Citroen and Mercedes Benz versions were quite good. Anyone know why they were banned in the US (given our decrepit roads, they might come in handy)?
 

lsquaredb

Well-Known Member
Messages
200
Reaction score
51
Location
Chester VT
They weren't banned. Citroen decided it wasn't worth it to design cars for the ever-increasing US safety and emissions regs. Some of Citroen's innovations were at odds with DoT requirements. For example, in Europe, the SM had six halogen self-leveling, steering headlights that were under glass fairings. In the US it got a hideous static installation four round tungsten sealed beams.
 

OLDBENZ

Member
Messages
15
Reaction score
12
Interesting - I have a CSL and an SM. Very different cars but both manage to take me back to my childhood in the 70s. I have had both just over a year. The CSL has only cost me a replacement headlight grille (courtesy of a pheasant which was careful not to damage any paintwork) whereas the SM has already chewed through a head gasket.
IMG_0042.jpg
 

WISE9UY

Well-Known Member
Site Donor
Messages
577
Reaction score
62
Location
Carmel, Indiana, USA
Nice read and interesting to see the cars they are compared to. A Dino 246, Iso Rivolta, and 911S cost the same. An E-Type was half the price. Amazing.

Great article and great read. The comparisons are good too and here comes the biggest question... had you spent the 5k back in the day and kept whatever you bought in the garage, what panned out to be the best buy? Amazing to think the Dino 246 cost essentially the same but think they go for a quarter million now. Interesting other mentions in there too of long gone marques like Iso and Jensen... thanks for the trip back in time!
 

3.0CS

Active Member
Site Donor
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
Great article! I am lucky to have both a 3.0CS and a Citroen SM. Really different cars, one better than the other in some respects but both great, with stunning looks, though the SM was as odd and futuristic back then as it seems to me now, versus the very conservative but strikingly beautiful Karmann coupe design.
 
Top